Parribacus caledonicus, author: Collection VLIZ
Acanthephyra eximea, author: Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Kevin MacIsaac
Acanthephyra - pair of scarlet shrimps, author: Nozes, Claude
Inachus dorsettensis (Pennant, 1777), author: IMARES

DecaNet (World List of Decapoda)

Decanet taxon details

Orconectes stygocaneyi Hobbs, 2001

1780487  (urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1780487)

accepted
Species
Faxonius stygocaneyi (Hobbs, 2001) · unaccepted > superseded combination
Orconectes (Orconectes) stygocaneyi Hobbs, 2001 · unaccepted > superseded combination
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
(of Orconectes (Orconectes) stygocaneyi Hobbs, 2001) Hobbs, H.H., III. (2001). A new cave crayfish of the genus <i>Orconectes</i>, subgenus <i>Orconectes</i>, from Southcentral Missouri, U.S.A., with a key to the stygobitic species of the genus (Decapoda, Cambaridae). <em>Crustaceana.</em> 74(7): 635-646., available online at https://doi.org/10.1163/156854001750377911 [details] Available for editors  PDF available
DecaNet eds. (2025). DecaNet. Orconectes stygocaneyi Hobbs, 2001. Accessed at: https://www.decanet.info/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1780487 on 2025-09-13
Date
action
by
2024-11-21 19:53:09Z
created

original description (of Orconectes (Orconectes) stygocaneyi Hobbs, 2001) Hobbs, H.H., III. (2001). A new cave crayfish of the genus <i>Orconectes</i>, subgenus <i>Orconectes</i>, from Southcentral Missouri, U.S.A., with a key to the stygobitic species of the genus (Decapoda, Cambaridae). <em>Crustaceana.</em> 74(7): 635-646., available online at https://doi.org/10.1163/156854001750377911 [details] Available for editors  PDF available
From editor or global species database
Classification Dooley et al. (2022) provide a phylogeny that at least for the 16S gene shows this species does indeed belong with the cave Orconectes. However, their COI data suggests that it might actually better fit with the Cambarus. Regardless, it does not seem to fit well with Faxonius. So based on this current information, we are placing this species back into the genus Orconectes until more data are available to confirm or refute this placement. [details]